CCD2 in the Checkout: What Changes for BNPL and Purchase on Invoice | ALLES LEGAL #134

🎧 In episode #134 of Alles Legal – Fintech-Recht kompakt, we explore how the new Consumer Credit Directive (CCD2) is reshaping the checkout for BNPL, purchase on invoice and instalment payments. – Tune in now!

Podcast: https://paymentandbanking.podigee.io/825-alles-legal-133-ccd2-im-checkout-was-sich-fur-bnpl-und-rechnungskauf-andert/

CCD2: New checkout requirements

In the latest episode of Alles Legal – Fintech-Recht kompakt, Annerton partner Dr Florian Lörsch speaks with host Dana Wondra from Payment & Banking about what the new Consumer Credit Directive, CCD2, means for Buy Now Pay Later, purchase on invoice and instalment payments.

The implementation of CCD2 into German law will affect many processes in e-commerce. The checkout is particularly relevant: from how payment options are displayed to pre-contractual information, creditworthiness assessments, withdrawal rights and contract conclusion.

Advertising, price information and new unfair competition rules

Even displaying purchase on invoice or instalment payment options during checkout may have legal consequences. Depending on the setup, this may qualify as advertising for consumer credit. Providers may then need to comply with requirements on presenting costs, interest rates and representative examples.

New rules under unfair competition law will also apply. In future, credit advertising must avoid certain statements and clearly indicate costs where credit is provided for a fee.

SECCI and pre-contractual information

Pre-contractual information will also become more important. The European Standardised Consumer Credit Information form, known as SECCI, will also need to be considered for certain BNPL and purchase-on-invoice models.

There may be templates and simplifications for specific cases, such as short terms or low amounts. However, integrating these information duties properly into the checkout will still be a practical challenge.

Creditworthiness checks and declined customers

Creditworthiness assessments are another key issue. Where a customer is declined, a purely technical response will not be enough. Providers must provide certain information, including why the decision was made and what rights the customer has.

Withdrawal rights: More responsibility for providers

The statutory model withdrawal instruction will no longer apply. Providers will therefore need to draft their own wording and take greater responsibility for its legal quality. At the same time, the risk of an indefinite withdrawal right will be limited.

Conclusion

CCD2 will not change only one part of the checkout. It affects the entire customer journey: product communication, payment options, assessment processes, information duties and contractual documentation. Providers should therefore review and adapt their processes at an early stage.

About this podcast

Alles Legal – Fintech Recht Kompakt delivers sharp, weekly insights into legal and compliance matters in the world of banking. (in German only)
This podcast is a collaboration between Payment & Banking and PayTechLaw.
Each Wednesday, we unpack the legal developments shaping the financial world – clearly, concisely, and without the legal jargon.
Since 2021, PayTechLaw authors and Annerton attorneys have brought depth and clarity to complex topics.
Whether it’s PSD3, DORA, or FiDA – we provide the legal context you need.
In 20 minutes. No detours.



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
Virtuelle IBANs im Visier Was die neue Bafin-Aufsichtsmitteilung für Banken und Zahlungsdienstleister bedeutet Virtual IBANs under BaFin scrutiny: New AML expectations for banks and payment service providers
Read More

Virtual IBANs under BaFin scrutiny: New AML expectations for banks and payment service providers

Virtual IBANs have become an established component of modern payment models. With Supervisory Notice 06/2026, BaFin now clarifies its expectations for credit institutions and payment service providers regarding transparency, anti-money laundering compliance and risk management in complex virtual IBAN structures.
Read More
PFOF-Verbot
Read More

The PFOF ban comes into force: What the new BaFin supervisory statement means for brokers and neobrokers

Since 1 July 2026, the ban on Payment for Order Flow (“PFOF”) has also been in force for purely domestic business relationships in Germany. On 22 July 2026, BaFin published a supervisory statement on this matter, in which it sets out in concrete terms for the first time which business models it considers to be compliant with the rules - and which are not.
Read More
FIU-Jahresbericht 2025 – Wesentliche Entwicklungen im Überblick FIU Annual Report 2025 – Key Developments at a Glance
Read More

FIU Annual Report 2025 – Key Developments at a Glance

Germany's FIU recorded a historic number of suspicious activity reports in 2025, while the number of analytical reports declined significantly. Alongside new regulatory requirements and a stronger international focus, neobanks have emerged as a key pillar of reporting activity. This article analyses the most important developments and highlights the questions that remain unanswered in the annual report.
Read More
EuGH schafft Klarheit: Nicht jede Weiterleitung von Geldern Dritter ist ein Zahlungsdienst im Sinne der PSD2 ECJ Clarifies the Scope of PSD2: Not Every Transfer of Third-Party Funds Constitutes a Payment Service
Read More

ECJ Clarifies the Scope of PSD2: Not Every Transfer of Third-Party Funds Constitutes a Payment Service

The ECJ has further clarified the distinction between payment services and other business models. The judgment confirms that merely receiving and forwarding third-party funds does not automatically trigger licensing requirements under PSD2. The decision provides greater legal certainty for FinTechs, platform operators and other businesses handling payment flows, while emphasising that the specific business model remains decisive.
Read More