BaFin Guidance Notice on crypto-asset services under MiCAR – authorisation requirement notification procedure (2)

Kryptowerte-Dienstleistungen nach MiCAR

On 3 January 2025, BaFin published the Guidance Notice on crypto-asset services MiCAR (“Guidance Notice”). In addition to interpretation notes on crypto-asset services, which were already discussed in the blog post of 8 January 2025, the Guidance Notice also contains information on the authorisation requirement with regard to the provision of crypto-asset services and the notification procedure, which are the subject of this blog post.

1. Obligation to obtain authorisation for crypto-asset services

Crypto-asset services are subject to authorisation in Germany if they are operated commercially and in Germany.

The provision of a crypto asset service is commercial if it is intended to last for a certain period of time and if it is provided with the intention of making a profit. This definition of commercial activity used in the Guidance Notice corresponds to the definition of commercial activity used by BaFin for other regulated services.

A significant difference between crypto-asset services and other regulated services (e.g. payment services pursuant to section 10 ZAG and banking business and financial services pursuant to section 32 KWG) is that a requirement for authorisation cannot be justified by the fact that the crypto-asset service is or is to be operated on a scale that requires a commercially organised business operation. The background to this is that the MiCAR only stipulates commerciality as a materiality threshold, so that the Guidance Notice, correctly, does not say a word about the size of the business, which may result in a licensing requirement.

With regard to domestic operations or domestic procurement, there is no change to other regulated services, as BaFin refers to the BaFin Guidance Notice “Notes regarding the licensing for conducting cross-border banking business and/or providing cross-border financial services“. In summary, commercial operated crypto-asset services in Germany are subject to authorisation if the company concerned

  • is domiciled in Germany or establishes a legally dependent branch office or maintains another physical presence from which it conducts business – even if only specifically with non-residents – or
  • addresses its offer from abroad using means of distance communication exclusively by way of cross-border service provision, without maintaining an intermediary network or a physical presence, also and especially to legal entities or natural persons who have their registered office or habitual residence in the Federal Republic of Germany (i.e. actively addresses its offer to the German market).

Furthermore, Bafin points out that companies can “passport” their MiCAR licence to other EEA states in accordance with Art. 65 MiCAR.

2. Exemptions from the authorisation requirement

Bafin also points out the exceptions to the authorisation requirement in the Guidance Notice. Companies that exclusively provide crypto-asset services within the group, for parent companies, subsidiaries and sister companies are not subject to authorisation (so-called “group privilege”). Likewise, the persons, companies and organisations listed in Art. 2 (2) lit. b to f MiCAR do not require authorisation (e.g. ECB, insolvency administrators acting in the course of insolvency proceedings, international public law organisations, etc.).

3. Notification procedure

Pursuant to Art. 59 (1) MiCAR in conjunction with Art. 60 MiCAR, certain companies that are already licensed under other regimes may provide crypto-asset services if these companies notify BaFin of this at least 40 working days before the first provision of these services and submit the complete information required under Art. 60 (7) MiCAR (so-called “notification procedure”). Unfortunately, the Guidance Notice is mainly limited to the reproduction of the respective MiCAR provisions and does not refer to the technical regulatory standards of ESMA, which are currently available as a final draft version and concretise the notification procedure. Only for operators of regulated markets does BaFin recommend that the information required for the notification procedure also be submitted to the competent stock exchange supervisory authority.

Based on the notification procedure, the following companies can provide the following crypto-asset services without additional authorisation:

  • CRR credit institutions all crypto asset services that they respectively report
  • Investment institutions and financial services institutions as well as credit institutions with a licence for underwriting business and/or principal broking service the crypto-asset services that are equivalent to the respective investment (ancillary) and financial services or banking business pursuant to Section 1 (1) sentence 2 nos. 4, 10 KWG and for which they have a licence pursuant to KWG or WpIG (Note: Art. 60 (3) MiCAR specifies which of the regulated services is equivalent to the specific crypto-asset service)
  • E-money institutions the custody and administration of crypto assets on behalf of clients and transfer services for crypto assets on behalf of clients with regard to e-money tokens issued by the e-money institution
  • Asset management companies the crypto-asset services reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients, advice on crypto-assets and portfolio management of crypto-assets if they are authorised to provide investment brokerage, investment advice and portfolio management in accordance with section 20 (2) or (3) KAGB
  • Operators of regulated markets within the meaning of Art. 4 (1) no. 18 MiFID II may operate trading platforms for crypto-assets


By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
They are not kidding - ESMA's Public Statement on the End of the MiCAR Transitional Period 1
Read More

They are not kidding – ESMA’s Public Statement on the End of the MiCAR Transitional Period

On 23 June 2026, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a public statement (ESMA75-113276571-1710) clarifying its expectations of crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) following the end of the transitional period under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) on 1 July 2026. The statement builds on ESMA's earlier statement of 17 April 2026 and is addressed, in particular, to entities that will not hold MiCAR authorization by the deadline but continue to service EU clients under national regimes.
Read More
MiCAR trifft PSD2: Warum E-Geld-Token plötzlich doppelt reguliert werden | ALLES LEGAL #138
Read More

MiCAR meets PSD2: Why e-money tokens are suddenly subject to dual regulation | ALLES LEGAL #138

Since the end of the EBA transitional period in March 2026, many crypto-asset service providers have had to assess whether, in addition to MiCAR, they also require a PSD2 or national payment services licence. In this episode, Kemal Ahmedi explains why crypto regulation and payment services law overlap and what this means for business models and licensing strategies.
Read More
MiCAR erklärt: Was die neue Krypto-Regulierung für Unternehmen verändert | ALLES LEGAL #137 MiCAR explained: How the new crypto regulation is changing the market | ALLES LEGAL #137
Read More

MiCAR explained: How the new crypto regulation is changing the market | ALLES LEGAL #137

With MiCAR, the EU is introducing its first harmonised regulatory framework for crypto-assets. In the latest episode of “Alles Legal – Fintech-Recht kompakt”, Kemal Ahmedi from Annerton explains which companies will require a MiCAR licence, why stablecoins are subject to stricter regulation and how the EU passport could reshape the European crypto market.
Read More