European Supervisory Authorities publish list of critical ICT third‑party providers

Illustratives Bild zu: ESAs Liste kritischen IKT-Dienstleister
Bild: setiadio/AdobeStock

On 19 November 2025, the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA) for the first time designated 19 critical ICT third‑party providers under Article 32(1) of the DORA — a key step for direct European supervision under DORA.

The selection was made using a two‑step model that assessed systemic relevance, substitutability, concentration risks and the scope of services provided. Among the critical providers are primarily large cloud and platform service providers such as AWS, Google Cloud, Deutsche Telekom and Microsoft as well as Oracle and SAP.

With their official classification as “critical ICT third‑party providers” (CTPPs), these firms are now subject to direct oversight by the ESAs. This includes annual risk analyses, comprehensive reporting obligations, on‑site inspections and active cooperation with the authorities. Supervision will be carried out by Joint Examination Teams (JETs) composed of staff from the ESAs and national authorities.

What does this mean for financial firms?

For financial firms, nothing changes in terms of their own responsibility: they must maintain transparency over dependencies, manage risks arising from third‑party relationships, and integrate the insights from ESA supervision into their ICT risk management.

Next steps in supervision:

  • From 2026: Start of operational supervision by the ESAs (approx. 30 supervisors).
  • JETs & Lead Overseer: Establishment of the examination teams and appointment of a lead overseer for each CTPP.
  • Opt‑in: Non‑designated providers may apply voluntarily for classification.

Here you can find the list of critical ICT service providers

The list has been published as a PDF under the title: The European Supervisory Authorities designate critical ICT third‑party providers under the Digital Operational Resilience Act | European Banking Authority



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
IT-Anforderungen an Finanzunternehmen in Deutschland – ein Überblick über den regulatorischen Rahmen IT Requirements for Financial Institutions in Germany – an overview of the regulatory framework
Read More

IT Requirements for Financial Institutions in Germany – an overview of the regulatory framework

IT regulation in the financial sector is becoming increasingly complex. With DORA, the FinmadiG, the NIS 2 Implementation Act, GDPR, the Cyber Resilience Act, the Data Act and the AI Act, financial institutions face far-reaching requirements regarding digital resilience, third-party risk management and governance. This article provides a structured overview of the current regulatory framework in Germany and at EU level.
Read More
KI-Regulierung in der Praxis: Was die Aufsicht zu KI im Finanzsektor wirklich sehen will | ALLES LEGAL #126 AI Regulation in Practice
Read More

AI Regulation in Practice: What Supervisors Really Expect to See from AI in the Financial Sector | ALLES LEGAL #126

Annerton partner Josefine Spengler explains how supervisory authorities assess AI systems in the financial sector in practice. AI is not treated as a regulatory special case but as an ICT system embedded within existing frameworks, particularly DORA. The focus lies on governance, accountability, traceability and ongoing monitoring. The interaction between DORA and the EU AI Act adds further complexity. The key takeaway: AI is not merely an IT issue – it is a management responsibility.
Read More