The End of the ODR platform – changes to Terms and Conditions are pending

The End of the ODR platform - changes to Terms and Conditions are pending 1

As of 20 July 2025, the EU will discontinue the Online Dispute Resolution Platform (ODR Platform). This platform was primarily intended to assist consumers and businesses in resolving conflicts out of court.

With Regulation (EU) No. 524/2013, the Commission established an ODR platform to serve as a central point of contact for consumers and entrepreneurs regarding disputes relating to online sales contracts and online service contracts. Entrepreneurs in the EU member states as well as in Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein were required to provide information about the ODR platform on their website and in their general terms and conditions as well as an easy accessible link to the platform.

However, there was no obligation to use the OS platform or to process consumer complaints through it. Many companies therefore excluded participation in online dispute resolution in their general terms and conditions.

In its nine years of existence, only around 234,000 complaints were submitted via the ODR platform. According to the available statistics, the online dispute resolution platform was particularly used for cross-border complaints (53.7%). The leading industry with the most complaints was air transport, accounting for 24 percent of cases. Germany recorded the highest number of cases, with just over 50,000.

Lack of acceptance among businesses and consumers

Therefore, the ODR platform was never well received. Neither by entrepreneurs nor by consumers.

The Commission has therefore drawn a line under it. Regulation (EU) 2024/3228 will discontinue the ODR platform. Complaints can only be submitted until 20 March 2025 and the ODR platform can be used for resolving complaints until 19 July 2025.

Need for action for eCommerce companies

Accordingly, there is a need for entrepreneurs who are active in e-commerce to adapt their general terms and conditions and their websites accordingly and to adapt or even delete the information on the ODR platform in good time.



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
Zwischen Swipe und Aufsicht Social Commerce boomt – doch rechtlich ist nicht alles erlaubt. Wann Plattformen Zahlungsdienste erbringen und welche Ausnahmen greifen, erklärt der Beitrag. Regulation
Read More

Between swiping and regulation

Social commerce is transforming social media platforms like TikTok into virtual marketplaces—but without a license to provide payment services, legal challenges arise. This article examines how existing payment regulations apply to new platform models and the regulatory tightrope they must walk.
Read More
Von Outsourcing zu Third Party Arrangements: Die neuen EBA-Leitlinien zum Drittparteienmanagement • Teil 1: Überblick über die wichtigsten Neuerungen
Read More

From Outsourcing to Third Party Arrangements: The New EBA Guidelines on Third-Party Risk Management 1/2

On 8 July 2025, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published a new consultation paper on the EBA Guidelines for third-party risk management. The draft goes well beyond the previous Outsourcing Guidelines from 2019. The objective is to establish a harmonised European framework for managing third-party risks, aligned in particular with the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). Part 1 of the analysis highlights the key innovations and main content; a practical assessment will follow in Part 2.
Read More
The Determining Role of the Schufa Score in Third-Party Decisions 2
Read More

The Determining Role of the Schufa Score in Third-Party Decisions

Whether the Schufa score is decisive for third-party credit decisions has, since the CJEU ruling of 7 December 2023 (C-634/21), determined whether its mere calculation qualifies as an automated decision within the meaning of Article 22(1) GDPR. The CJEU made it clear that this cannot be assumed in general but must instead be assessed by national courts on a case-by-case basis. Since then, uncertainty has prevailed as to how the requirement of “decisiveness” should be interpreted.
Read More