Third-Party Providers in AML: Outsourcing, Responsibility & New EU Requirements | ALLES LEGAL #130

🎧External service providers have long played a key role in anti-money laundering compliance, but the new EU AML framework is shifting responsibility more clearly back to firms themselves. In the latest episode of “Alles Legal – Fintech-Recht kompakt”, Sebastian Glaab and Dana Wondra discuss what this means for outsourcing, KYC processes and digital identification. – Tune in now!

Third-party providers in AML: what is changing under the new EU framework

In episode #130 of “Alles Legal – Fintech-Recht kompakt”, Dana Wondra from Payment & Banking speaks with Sebastian Glaab, attorney at Annerton and PayTechLaw author, about the future role of external service providers in anti-money laundering compliance. The episode focuses on a central question: which tasks firms may still outsource in future, and where regulatory responsibility will need to remain firmly in-house.

Outsourcing remains important – but with clearer limits

Third-party providers have become an integral part of AML practice. Whether for video identification, digital identity checks or technical support in KYC processes, many obliged entities have relied on external providers for years. Under the new European AML regime, however, the regulatory boundaries are becoming more clearly defined.

The overall direction is clear: certain core functions should no longer be capable of being fully outsourced. This applies in particular to strategic decisions, risk analysis and key control functions. Firms will therefore need to retain stronger ownership of essential compliance responsibilities.

Responsibility stays with the institution

This does not mean that third-party providers will disappear from AML structures. Their role is evolving rather than diminishing. They will remain relevant for operational and technical support, especially in identification procedures and digital compliance solutions.

At the same time, the new framework reinforces a fundamental principle: ultimate responsibility always remains with the obliged entity. Outsourcing a process does not outsource regulatory accountability. Firms will therefore need to manage and monitor external providers more closely and embed outsourced services within robust internal governance structures.

Identity verification is changing

One of the clearest examples of this shift can be seen in identity verification. Processes such as video identification are increasingly being reassessed, while more standardised and harmonised European solutions are gaining traction. Approaches linked to eIDAS and digital identity frameworks are likely to become more important.

The aim is to achieve more consistent, secure and harmonised identification across the EU. For firms, this also means reviewing current processes early and preparing for changing regulatory expectations.

Practical challenges for existing outsourcing models

In practice, many existing outsourcing models are unlikely to carry over unchanged into the new system. In areas such as monitoring, review procedures and control-related functions, firms will need to distinguish more carefully between tasks that can be delegated and those that must remain internal.

This creates uncertainty, but it also highlights the growing importance of clear internal responsibilities, reliable control frameworks and a well-defined relationship between institutions and their service providers.

What firms should focus on now

The episode makes one point particularly clear: third-party providers will remain an important part of modern AML compliance, but under different conditions. The decisive factor will be how effectively firms combine external solutions with internal accountability. Now is the right time to review outsourcing models, governance structures and identification processes in light of the new EU AML regime.

About This Podcast

Alles Legal – Fintech Law in Brief delivers weekly insights into legal and compliance topics in the banking and fintech sectors.
This podcast is a collaboration between Payment & Banking and PayTechLaw.
Each Wednesday, our experts explain current legal developments in a clear and concise way – no legalese, just the context you need. Since 2021, PayTechLaw authors and Annerton lawyers have been bringing legal depth to the mic without losing clarity.
Whether it’s PSD3, DORA or FiDA – we provide the background you need. In 20 minutes. Straight to the point.



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
AML im Profifußball: Welche Pflichten in Zukunft konkret gelten AML in Professional Football: What Specific Obligations Will Apply in Future
Read More

AML in Professional Football: What Specific Obligations Will Apply in Future

The new EU Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AML Regulation) brings professional football systematically into the scope of AML compliance for the first time. Clubs and intermediaries must implement robust risk assessments, governance structures and KYC processes. This article outlines the key obligations and their practical impact, particularly in high-risk areas such as transfers, sponsorship and investor relations.
Read More
Sanktionen und AML: Wie sich Compliance im Finanzsektor verändert | ALLES LEGAL #129 Sanctions and AML: How Compliance in the Financial Sector Is Changing | ALLES LEGAL #129
Read More

Sanctions and AML: How Compliance in the Financial Sector Is Changing | ALLES LEGAL #129

Financial sanctions have become part of everyday compliance work in the financial sector. Since the sanctions imposed against Russia and the rise of geopolitical tensions, their relevance has increased significantly. In this episode, Dana Wondra speaks with Sebastian Glaab about why sanctions must now be more closely integrated into financial institutions’ risk management systems.
Read More