Financial services – The same word, but not the same meaning under regulatory law and civil law

What are financial services? | Legal definition | Cover picture: onephoto

What are financial services?

What are financial services?  One might think that this question can be answered unambiguously. However, the context of the question is crucial. Are we talking about a regulatory law or a civil law context?

 

Financial services under regulatory law

In response to the above question, a regulatory lawyer would refer to Section 1 (1a) Sentence 2 of the German Banking Act (Kreditwesengesetz “KWG”). According to this provision, the services and activities listed there are financial services. These include investment brokerage, finance leasing and, relatively recently, the crypto custody business.

The definition from Section 1 (1a) Sentence 2 KWG is particularly important for assessing if a financial service requiring a licence is provided.

 

Financial services in civil law

The civil lawyer would refer to the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch “BGB”) and present § 312 (5) first Half-Sentence BGB as the answer. According to this provision, financial services are banking services as well as services in connection with the granting of a loan, insurance, pension provision for individuals, investment of money or payment.

What is immediately noticeable is that this definition is very broad. On the one hand, the services of Section 1 (1a) Sentence 2 KWG can be subsumed without further ado (“services in connection with the …investment of money“), on the other hand, this definition also covers other regulated services, such as payment services (“services in connection with …payment“). Furthermore, it is sufficient if the service in question is merely “in connection” with one of the services listed there.

This definition is important for the assessment of obligations towards consumers and rights of consumers.

 

Background to the different definitions

Section 312(5) first Half-Sentence BGB is based on the definition of Art. 2 lit. b Directive 2002/65/EC (so-called Financial Services Distance Selling Directive)[1] and Art. 2 No. 12 Directive 2011/83/EU (so-called Consumer Rights Directive), which lay down requirements for transactions with consumers at a distance and off-premises (information obligations, right of withdrawal, etc.). These directives only deal with consumer law and not with regulatory law. Accordingly, the inclusion of this definition in the BGB led to a deviation from the definition of financial services already contained in the KWG.

 

Conclusion

The original question can be answered unambiguously if the respective context is clear (regulatory law = Section 1 (1a) Sentence 2 KWG; civil law = Section 312 (5) first Half-Sentence BGB).

 

Fun fact

Financial instrument pursuant BGB and KWG have the same meaning.


[1] Directive 97/7/EC contained only a non-exhaustive list of financial services.

 

Cover picture: Copyright © Adobe Stock/onephoto



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
Zwischen Swipe und Aufsicht Social Commerce boomt – doch rechtlich ist nicht alles erlaubt. Wann Plattformen Zahlungsdienste erbringen und welche Ausnahmen greifen, erklärt der Beitrag. Regulation
Read More

Between swiping and regulation

Social commerce is transforming social media platforms like TikTok into virtual marketplaces—but without a license to provide payment services, legal challenges arise. This article examines how existing payment regulations apply to new platform models and the regulatory tightrope they must walk.
Read More
BaFin puts turbo certificates on a tight leash 1
Read More

BaFin puts turbo certificates on a tight leash

General ruling to restrict the marketing, distribution and sale of turbo certificates to retail investors With its general ruling, BaFin imposed restrictions on the marketing, distribution and sale of turbo certificates. It sets out strict conditions for all sales activities relating to turbo certificates targeting retail investors.
Read More