Factoring and guarantee business in contrast to payment services | FinTech online course #13

Factoring and guarantee business in contrast to payment services | PayTechLaw | FinTech online course | sutthinon602

When a company wants to develop new financial or payment products, the question always arises as to whether the product in question is covered by an existing license. Or in other words: What can I actually do with the respective license?

Payment services must therefore be distinguished from other services requiring license. Two “classic” services that must be distinguished are factoring in accordance with Section 1 para. 1a sentence 2 no. 9 of the German Banking Act (KWG) and guarantee business in accordance with Section 1 para. 1 sentence 2 no. 8 of the KWG.

Distinction between factoring and payment services

When differentiating the factoring from a payment service, a distinction must be made between the civil law design of factoring and its regulatory valuation.

When it comes to factoring, the civil law differentiates between recourse and non-recourse factoring. In non-recourse factoring, the factoring company purchases receivables from companies that those have against their customers. The factoring company assumes the risk that the receivables are not paid (so-called default risk or delcredere risk). In terms of civil law, this is a receivables purchase agreement. In the case of recourse factoring, the receivables are also transferred to the factoring company, but the factoring company does not assume the risk of default. The factoring company can take recourse to the company in case of default of the purchased receivables. Under civil law this is classified as a loan agreement.

According to the German regulator Bundesanstalt für Finanzdiensteistungsaufsicht (BaFin), non-recourse factoring can be a payment service under the ZAG or a financial service under the KWG. The BaFin distinguishes according to whether the service, from an economic point of view, is aimed at payment processing or at financing the contractual partner. If the financing is the main focus, it is factoring according to the KWG. If it is more of a payment processing, it is considered a payment service. Since the BaFin takes an economic view, it is difficult to make a detailed distinction.

To return to the initial question: What can I actually do with the respective licence? The answer is simpler than expected. With a payment service license, factoring can be operated both in the form of a payment service under the German Payment Services Act (ZAG) and in the form of financial services under the German Banking Act (KWG). Unfortunately, it is not possible the other way round: With a license under the KWG, factoring cannot be operated in the form of a payment service.

Guarantee business and payment services

The guarantee business is a banking service in accordance with section 1 para. 1 sentence 2 no. 8 of the KWG and involves the “assumption of sureties, guarantees and other warranties on behalf of others“. This includes the granting of typical bank guarantees and sureties. In particular, the granting of a loan order or the assumption of debt are regarded as other warranties. This is generally not covered by a payment service license.

What does the guarantee business have to do with payment services? If a customer makes a purchase from a merchant using a credit card, the merchant receives an “assurance” from his payment service provider that the goods purchased with the credit card have been paid for. Only with this assurance it is legally secure for the merchant that payment by credit card is economically equivalent to cash. Depending on how this assurance is legally structured, it may be a guarantee. Usually, the courts regard the assurance as a so-called unconditional promise of payment (abstraktes Schuldanerkenntnis) and not as a guarantee. In some cases, individual payment service providers design this assurance more as a guarantee or (falsely) refer to it as a guarantee to the merchant. It is possible that the merchant also receives more extensive guarantees. Therefore, when drafting acceptance contracts, care must be taken to ensure that the payment service provider does not provide guarantees that are not covered by its respective license.

 

LINK TO THE HOMEPAGE OF THE FINTECH ONLINE COURSE

 

Cover picture: Copyright © Adobe/ sutthinon602

 



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
20. EU-Sanktionspaket gegen Russland: Was das für den Finanzsektor bedeutet 20th EU Sanctions Package against Russia: What It Means for the Financial Sector
Read More

20th EU Sanctions Package against Russia: What It Means for the Financial Sector

The EU’s 20th sanctions package against Russia increases the focus on sanctions circumvention via third countries, alternative payment channels and crypto structures. Banks, payment service providers and CASPs must strengthen their sanctions compliance with a stronger focus on payment flows, intermediaries and infrastructure risks.
Read More
Ist bei E-Geld ein Vertrag zwischen dem E-Geld-Herausgeber und der Akzeptanzstelle erforderlich? Is a contract between the e-money issuer and the merchant required for e-money?
Read More

Is a contract between the e-money issuer and the merchant required for e-money?

This article examines the European Commission’s controversial interpretation of Article 11(7) EMD2 regarding the definition of electronic money. It focuses on whether a contractual relationship between the e-money issuer and the accepting merchant is required for electronic money acceptance. The article concludes that Article 11(7) EMD2 does not establish a general contractual requirement for the acceptance of e-money.
Read More
Paris Blockchain Week 2026 – “The Bridge Between TradFi and Digital Assets”
Read More

Paris Blockchain Week 2026 – “The Bridge Between TradFi and Digital Assets”

Paris Blockchain Week 2026 highlighted the growing institutional adoption of digital assets. Under the theme “The Bridge Between TradFi and Digital Assets”, the event brought together leading players from traditional finance and the digital asset industry, focusing on tokenisation, stablecoins, MiCA and blockchain-based financial market infrastructures.
Read More