PayTechTalk 16 – No more surcharging (except in Berlin taxis) thanks to PSD2?

PayTechTalk 16 – Nie mehr Surcharging dank PSD2? | PayTechLaw
Please click here and accept cookies to load the SoundCloud player.

„Dit macht 1.50 extra, weeste“ – Surcharging in Berlin and other places

The dream of paying cashless without paying for it is about to come true. Finally, no more surcharging thanks to PSD2, right? Not quite: Frequent travelers to Berlin know the answer to the question, when they ask their taxi driver whether it might be possible to pay by credit card: “Sure, but that´s an extra 1.50 Euro, you know”. Not only taxis in Berlin charge this fee, Lufthansa and Deutsche Bahn charge you for payments with credit card or PayPal, as well. Payments for payments are called surcharging and it is, even if this impression might be given by our examples, not only common in the transportation branch, but also amongst many online-traders. Through the PSD2 regulation this situation has been solved by the legislator, or at least they have tried. The surcharging prohibition is implemented through § 270a BGB in Germany, which has been in effect since 13th January 2018. In our PayTechTalk Episode 16 we take a closer look at this paragraph.

Market regulation versus market distortion

What exactly are three party payment card schemes and four party payment card schemes when it comes to cashless payment transactions and why is distinguishing between them important for the surcharging issue? Does the prohibition also apply to PayPal and Sofort? How come Berlin taxi companies believe it does not apply to them? Are there any loopholes for online-traders to still make their customers pay for payments? Does the surcharging regulation succeed in relieving the consumer or is its only consequence a distortion of markets?

Many questions, all of which my colleague Susanne is happy to answer in our PayTechTalk Episode 16 – as always in a clear, easily understandable way.

 

The original version of this podcast is German.

 

Titelbild / Cover picture: Copyright © PayTechLaw



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
BRUBEG erklärt: Was das neue Bankenpaket für Institute verändert | ALLES LEGAL #139 BRUBEG Explained: What the New Banking Package Changes for Financial Institutions | ALLES LEGAL #139
Read More

BRUBEG Explained: What the New Banking Package Changes for Financial Institutions | ALLES LEGAL #139

BRUBEG is intended to reduce bureaucracy, yet for many banks it initially means new obligations, additional processes and increased compliance requirements. In this episode of Alles Legal – Fintech-Recht kompakt, Renate Prinz explains what is behind the legislation and how the implementation of CRD VI and Basel III will affect financial institutions across Europe.
Read More
MiCAR trifft PSD2: Warum E-Geld-Token plötzlich doppelt reguliert werden | ALLES LEGAL #138
Read More

MiCAR meets PSD2: Why e-money tokens are suddenly subject to dual regulation | ALLES LEGAL #138

Since the end of the EBA transitional period in March 2026, many crypto-asset service providers have had to assess whether, in addition to MiCAR, they also require a PSD2 or national payment services licence. In this episode, Kemal Ahmedi explains why crypto regulation and payment services law overlap and what this means for business models and licensing strategies.
Read More
MiCAR erklärt: Was die neue Krypto-Regulierung für Unternehmen verändert | ALLES LEGAL #137 MiCAR explained: How the new crypto regulation is changing the market | ALLES LEGAL #137
Read More

MiCAR explained: How the new crypto regulation is changing the market | ALLES LEGAL #137

With MiCAR, the EU is introducing its first harmonised regulatory framework for crypto-assets. In the latest episode of “Alles Legal – Fintech-Recht kompakt”, Kemal Ahmedi from Annerton explains which companies will require a MiCAR licence, why stablecoins are subject to stricter regulation and how the EU passport could reshape the European crypto market.
Read More