Bundestag adopts softener for hard Brexit

Weichmacher für harten Brexit | softener for hard Brexit | PayTechLaw

Are you a fan of Great Britain or are you even a British citizen? Are you active in the payment industry? Are you afraid of a hard Brexit? Great, then we’ve got something for you. On 21/02/2019, the German Bundestag adopted the Act on Tax and Other Accompanying Measures for the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union (Brexit Tax Accompanying Act, Brexit TAA). If this Act enters into force without any amendments, we will have a softener for British payment service providers in Germany in the case of a hard Brexit.

Transition period for British payment service providers

Under the Brexit TAA, British payment service providers will continue to be able to use the EU passport in Germany under certain conditions. In other words, British payment service providers may continue to provide payment services in Germany even after a Brexit.

Conditions for the transition period

Before you crack open the champagne bottles and raise your glass to Europe, you should read on as there are a few catches:

Catch 1: The transition period only applies to Germany. This means that the transition period only applies to the business British payment service providers carry out in Germany. It remains to be seen if other countries follow the German example.

Catch 2: The transition period applies for a maximum of 21 months. After this period, British payment service providers would no longer be able to rely on the EU passport.

Catch 3: The transition period does not automatically apply. It needs to be ordered by BaFin. BaFin’s decision to that effect has to be necessary to avoid disadvantages regarding the functionality or the stability of the payment transaction markets. However, the German Federal Government has made it clear in the explanatory memorandum to the Act that this requirement does not have to be interpreted too strictly.

Catch 4: The transition period only applies to existing customers. Genuine new business is not permitted during this transition period.

After Brexit is before Brexit

The transition period passed by the German Bundestag is therefore little more than clutching at straws for British payment service providers who it seems, are only just realising that there will be a Brexit. The Brexit TAA is not and was not intended to be a permanent solution. At least it seems as if one of the secrets has been revealed in the area of payment transactions, which the great Ephraim Kishon once phrased like this:

The greatest secret of the English is why they don’t emigrate.

 

Cover picture: Copyright © fotolia / Pixelot



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
DigiFin26 – Rebuilding Resilience 1
Read More

DigiFin26 – Rebuilding Resilience

Digitisation, regulation, geopolitical uncertainty – the pace of change in the financial sector has rarely been as intense as it is today. DigiFin25 brings together the key players to discuss the future of the financial industry – and we’re right at the heart of it.
Read More
PFOF-Verbot
Read More

The PFOF ban comes into force: What the new BaFin supervisory statement means for brokers and neobrokers

Since 1 July 2026, the ban on Payment for Order Flow (“PFOF”) has also been in force for purely domestic business relationships in Germany. On 22 July 2026, BaFin published a supervisory statement on this matter, in which it sets out in concrete terms for the first time which business models it considers to be compliant with the rules - and which are not.
Read More
FIU-Jahresbericht 2025 – Wesentliche Entwicklungen im Überblick FIU Annual Report 2025 – Key Developments at a Glance
Read More

FIU Annual Report 2025 – Key Developments at a Glance

Germany's FIU recorded a historic number of suspicious activity reports in 2025, while the number of analytical reports declined significantly. Alongside new regulatory requirements and a stronger international focus, neobanks have emerged as a key pillar of reporting activity. This article analyses the most important developments and highlights the questions that remain unanswered in the annual report.
Read More
EuGH schafft Klarheit: Nicht jede Weiterleitung von Geldern Dritter ist ein Zahlungsdienst im Sinne der PSD2 ECJ Clarifies the Scope of PSD2: Not Every Transfer of Third-Party Funds Constitutes a Payment Service
Read More

ECJ Clarifies the Scope of PSD2: Not Every Transfer of Third-Party Funds Constitutes a Payment Service

The ECJ has further clarified the distinction between payment services and other business models. The judgment confirms that merely receiving and forwarding third-party funds does not automatically trigger licensing requirements under PSD2. The decision provides greater legal certainty for FinTechs, platform operators and other businesses handling payment flows, while emphasising that the specific business model remains decisive.
Read More