Commission increases its fight against money laundering and terrorism financing

Kommission | Geldwaesche | Terrorismusfinanzierung | Commission | anti-money laundering | terrorism financing | PayTechLaw

The EU Commission increases its fight against money laundering – will this pave the way for a new supervisory authority?

The European Commission (“EU Commission”) wants to increase its efforts against money laundering and the financing of terrorism and published a set of measures on 7 May 2020.

This set of measures included:

  • the action plan for a new comprehensive EU policy to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorism,
  • a more refined and transparent method to identify high-risk third countries,
  • an updated list of high-risk third countries.

Background

Not least due to the introduction of the Fourth and Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive there are already strict EU anti-money laundering rules. However, as directives have to be transposed into national law, some EU member states do not apply the rules in a uniform manner. Already back in July 2019, the EU Commission pointed out structural deficits regarding the fight against money laundering and terrorism financing and presented numerous measures to address this.

Action plan

The action plan that was published was based on the six pillars and its concrete measures are intended to be implemented over the next twelve months:

  • Effective application of the EU rules by the member states by implementing the EU rules
  • Proposal for a uniform and more harmonised set of EU rules by the Commission
  • Establishing a supervisory body at EU level
  • A mechanism to coordinate and support the central reporting bodies in the member states
  • Enforcing applicable criminal law provisions and information exchange at EU level
  • A stronger EU as a global player

New EU supervisory authority

In the first quarter of 2021, the EU Commission will propose the establishment of a supervisory body at EU level. It remains to be seen whether this will constitute a new supervisory authority or whether the supervision remains the responsibility of the European Banking Authority (EBA). Since 1 January 2020, the EBA has taken on the leading role in coordinating and monitoring the prevention of money laundering and the financing of terrorism at EU level (see also our contribution on this). However, EU vice president Valdis Dombrovskis said when the measures were presented that if the EBA was to be given this task, it would need to improve.

According to a media report, BaFin favours a central body that is separate from the EBA. BaFin director Thorsten Pötsch, who is responsible for transactions and anti-money laundering, is said to have stated at the BaFin annual press conference: “For various reasons, we are in favour of a different central body. The EBA is a pure banking authority.”

Updated list

Pursuant to the Anti-money Laundering Directive (AMLD), the Commission is legally obliged to identify high-risk third countries whose rules on combating money laundering and terrorism financing contain strategic deficits. As a result of the modified method, the new list is now more aligned with the lists published by FATF.

The following countries were added to the list: The Bahamas, Barbados, Botswana, Ghana, Jamaica, Cambodia, Mauritius, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Panama and Zimbabwe.

The following countries were deleted from the list: Ethiopia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Guyana, Sri Lanka and Tunisia.

The list still needs to be ratified by the EU member states and the EU Parliament.

Consequences of the list for financial institutions

According to the EU Commission, the mere fact that a country has been included in the list will not trigger any sanctions and will not restrict trade relations or development aid; however, banks and other obliged persons must apply increased vigilance with respect to transactions with countries included on the list.

Next steps

The EU-Commission has released the action plan for public consultation. Authorities, interested parties as well as citizens have until 29 July to submit contributions.

The Commission is assessing whether the action plan will lead to new regulation. In light of the planned review of the EU rules on combating money laundering and terrorism financing, it intends to carry out an impact assessment and present legislative proposals in early 2021. The results of the public consultation will be taken into consideration for this impact assessment.

Evaluation

The EU Commission’s efforts to harmonise the implementation of rules to combat money laundering and terrorism financing in the EU member states are highly laudable. We believe a uniform legal framework is essential to improve the fight against money laundering and terrorism financing at EU level. Additionally, harmonised rules would avoid regulatory arbitrage and create a level playing field at EU level. We also believe that the creation of a central agency or supervisory authority at EU levels is important in order to monitor adherence to the harmonised rules and efficiently remedy any shortcomings. It is to be expected that national supervisory authorities will continue to play a key role in combating money laundering and terrorism financing. We will closely monitor the developments in this area and keep you informed here on PayTechLaw.

 

Cover picture: Copyright © Adobe Stock / lassedesignen



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
Virtuelle IBANs im Visier Was die neue Bafin-Aufsichtsmitteilung für Banken und Zahlungsdienstleister bedeutet Virtual IBANs under BaFin scrutiny: New AML expectations for banks and payment service providers
Read More

Virtual IBANs under BaFin scrutiny: New AML expectations for banks and payment service providers

Virtual IBANs have become an established component of modern payment models. With Supervisory Notice 06/2026, BaFin now clarifies its expectations for credit institutions and payment service providers regarding transparency, anti-money laundering compliance and risk management in complex virtual IBAN structures.
Read More
PFOF-Verbot
Read More

The PFOF ban comes into force: What the new BaFin supervisory statement means for brokers and neobrokers

Since 1 July 2026, the ban on Payment for Order Flow (“PFOF”) has also been in force for purely domestic business relationships in Germany. On 22 July 2026, BaFin published a supervisory statement on this matter, in which it sets out in concrete terms for the first time which business models it considers to be compliant with the rules - and which are not.
Read More
FIU-Jahresbericht 2025 – Wesentliche Entwicklungen im Überblick FIU Annual Report 2025 – Key Developments at a Glance
Read More

FIU Annual Report 2025 – Key Developments at a Glance

Germany's FIU recorded a historic number of suspicious activity reports in 2025, while the number of analytical reports declined significantly. Alongside new regulatory requirements and a stronger international focus, neobanks have emerged as a key pillar of reporting activity. This article analyses the most important developments and highlights the questions that remain unanswered in the annual report.
Read More
EuGH schafft Klarheit: Nicht jede Weiterleitung von Geldern Dritter ist ein Zahlungsdienst im Sinne der PSD2 ECJ Clarifies the Scope of PSD2: Not Every Transfer of Third-Party Funds Constitutes a Payment Service
Read More

ECJ Clarifies the Scope of PSD2: Not Every Transfer of Third-Party Funds Constitutes a Payment Service

The ECJ has further clarified the distinction between payment services and other business models. The judgment confirms that merely receiving and forwarding third-party funds does not automatically trigger licensing requirements under PSD2. The decision provides greater legal certainty for FinTechs, platform operators and other businesses handling payment flows, while emphasising that the specific business model remains decisive.
Read More