PayTechTalk 34 – licence types for payment service providers

PayTechTalk 34 | Erlaubnistypen fuer Zahlungsdienstleister | PayTechLaw
Please click here and accept cookies to load the SoundCloud player.

Recently I looked into the topic of licence types for payment service providers on PayTechLaw. In my blog post “May I or may I not? The licence types for payment service providers” I introduced the various licence types – and also created an infographic for those of you who prefer looking at visuals than reading. Often, however, a discussion enables you to look at a particular topic in even more detail and also from an additional perspective. Furthermore, there are many people who do not like reading or looking at visuals but who do like listening!

The different types of licences for payment service providers. A matryoshka

For all those of you interested in the topic of licence types for payment service providers and who would like to know when you need what licence for payment services – AND who like listening, I have returned to this topic, together with my colleague Susanne.

Matroschka_Erlaubnistypen fuer Zahlungsdienstleister | licence types for payment service providers

From small to large – from payment institution to credit institution: In our 34th episode of PayTechTalk, we unravel the licence types matryoshka for our listeners and explain, among other things, the differences between a licence for a payment institution, an e-money institution and a CRR credit institution. We also discuss when you require what type of licence and when it is advisable to aim for the mother or rather the little matryoshka doll of licence types.

Enjoy our PayTechTalk 34 – and I look forward to receiving any feedback, suggestions, comments and discussions you may have regarding this topic. If you like, you can post them directly here in the comments box.

Further information and links regarding licence types of payment service providers:

 

The original podcast is in German

Cover picture: Copyright © PayTechLaw — Matroschka: © fotolia / Виталий Бахтин



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
MiCAR trifft PSD2: Warum E-Geld-Token plötzlich doppelt reguliert werden | ALLES LEGAL #138
Read More

MiCAR meets PSD2: Why e-money tokens are suddenly subject to dual regulation | ALLES LEGAL #138

Since the end of the EBA transitional period in March 2026, many crypto-asset service providers have had to assess whether, in addition to MiCAR, they also require a PSD2 or national payment services licence. In this episode, Kemal Ahmedi explains why crypto regulation and payment services law overlap and what this means for business models and licensing strategies.
Read More
MiCAR erklärt: Was die neue Krypto-Regulierung für Unternehmen verändert | ALLES LEGAL #137 MiCAR explained: How the new crypto regulation is changing the market | ALLES LEGAL #137
Read More

MiCAR explained: How the new crypto regulation is changing the market | ALLES LEGAL #137

With MiCAR, the EU is introducing its first harmonised regulatory framework for crypto-assets. In the latest episode of “Alles Legal – Fintech-Recht kompakt”, Kemal Ahmedi from Annerton explains which companies will require a MiCAR licence, why stablecoins are subject to stricter regulation and how the EU passport could reshape the European crypto market.
Read More
Datenschutz im Zahlungsverkehr – Rechtliche Grundlagen und Besonderheiten Data Protection in Payment Services – Legal Framework and Key Particularities
Read More

Data Protection in Payment Services – Legal Framework and Key Particularities

Data protection in payment services operates within the complex interplay of the GDPR, PSD2 and the German ZAG. A key challenge lies in the legal classification of payment data, as transaction data may reveal highly sensitive insights into individuals’ private lives. This article analyses the principal legal bases for data processing as well as the allocation of data protection responsibilities among payment service providers, PISPs and AISPs.
Read More