PayTechTalk 34 – licence types for payment service providers

PayTechTalk 34 | Erlaubnistypen fuer Zahlungsdienstleister | PayTechLaw
Please click here and accept cookies to load the SoundCloud player.

Recently I looked into the topic of licence types for payment service providers on PayTechLaw. In my blog post “May I or may I not? The licence types for payment service providers” I introduced the various licence types – and also created an infographic for those of you who prefer looking at visuals than reading. Often, however, a discussion enables you to look at a particular topic in even more detail and also from an additional perspective. Furthermore, there are many people who do not like reading or looking at visuals but who do like listening!

The different types of licences for payment service providers. A matryoshka

For all those of you interested in the topic of licence types for payment service providers and who would like to know when you need what licence for payment services – AND who like listening, I have returned to this topic, together with my colleague Susanne.

Matroschka_Erlaubnistypen fuer Zahlungsdienstleister | licence types for payment service providers

From small to large – from payment institution to credit institution: In our 34th episode of PayTechTalk, we unravel the licence types matryoshka for our listeners and explain, among other things, the differences between a licence for a payment institution, an e-money institution and a CRR credit institution. We also discuss when you require what type of licence and when it is advisable to aim for the mother or rather the little matryoshka doll of licence types.

Enjoy our PayTechTalk 34 – and I look forward to receiving any feedback, suggestions, comments and discussions you may have regarding this topic. If you like, you can post them directly here in the comments box.

Further information and links regarding licence types of payment service providers:

 

The original podcast is in German

Cover picture: Copyright © PayTechLaw — Matroschka: © fotolia / Виталий Бахтин



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
Virtuelle IBANs im Visier Was die neue Bafin-Aufsichtsmitteilung für Banken und Zahlungsdienstleister bedeutet Virtual IBANs under BaFin scrutiny: New AML expectations for banks and payment service providers
Read More

Virtual IBANs under BaFin scrutiny: New AML expectations for banks and payment service providers

Virtual IBANs have become an established component of modern payment models. With Supervisory Notice 06/2026, BaFin now clarifies its expectations for credit institutions and payment service providers regarding transparency, anti-money laundering compliance and risk management in complex virtual IBAN structures.
Read More
EuGH schafft Klarheit: Nicht jede Weiterleitung von Geldern Dritter ist ein Zahlungsdienst im Sinne der PSD2 ECJ Clarifies the Scope of PSD2: Not Every Transfer of Third-Party Funds Constitutes a Payment Service
Read More

ECJ Clarifies the Scope of PSD2: Not Every Transfer of Third-Party Funds Constitutes a Payment Service

The ECJ has further clarified the distinction between payment services and other business models. The judgment confirms that merely receiving and forwarding third-party funds does not automatically trigger licensing requirements under PSD2. The decision provides greater legal certainty for FinTechs, platform operators and other businesses handling payment flows, while emphasising that the specific business model remains decisive.
Read More