PayTechTalk 37 – Approval procedures: directors, qualifying holdings, and capital requirements

PayTechTalk 37: Geschäftsführer, Inhaber und Eigenkapital
Please click here and accept cookies to load the SoundCloud player.

In our 34th episode of PayTechTalk I talked with my colleague Christian about the licence types for payment service providers. Upon hearing this podcast, Marko Wenthin, one of the co-founders of SolarisBank, asked us to talk in more detail about application for authorization and in particular about directors, qualifying holdings,  and capital requirements, as it is precisely these three topics that can be a bottleneck in the application process of a payment institute. In particular, directors and persons with a qualifying holding always play an important role in approval procedures. This is why Peter and I are happy to answer to this request today.

Enjoy our PayTechTalk 37!

Directors, qualifying holdings, and capital requirements

Directors

Who can be a director or CEO of an institute? Can anybody do this? When do you have the relevant technical qualifications and reliability? Is it, for example, sufficient if the prospective director has completed a traineeship at a bank or is that not enough? What exactly is the required theoretical and practical knowledge – and do they need any management experience? And how many directors does an institute require?

Holders

Who is regarded as owner of a qualifying shareholding? How is the qualifying holding determined? Is it just about shares or do voting rights also play a role? When is the influence on the business considered to be significant?

You will also find out why it makes sense to keep the shareholding structure of the institute as simple as possible and to oblige investors right from the start to provide all required information by BaFin. In our podcast we also talk about why the ownership control procedure may also be viewed as the “little authorization application as part of a large authorization application”.

Capital Requirements

How much initial capital is required for a payment institute – and how exactly should the two capital components, i.e. initial capital and own funds be calculated?

 

Further information and links

 

The original podcast is in German

Cover picture: Copyright © PayTechLaw



By continuing, you accept our privacy policy.
You May Also Like
BRUBEG & Fit-and-Proper: More supervision for key functions in banks | ALLES LEGAL #141 1
Read More

BRUBEG & Fit-and-Proper: More supervision for key functions in banks | ALLES LEGAL #141

The BRUBEG reform significantly expands governance requirements within regulated institutions. In this episode of Alles Legal – Fintech-Recht kompakt, Dana Wondra from Payment & Banking speaks with Renate Prinz, Partner at Annerton and PayTechLaw author, about the broader scope of Fit-and-Proper assessments and what this means for banks in practice.
Read More
Drittstaatenbanken in der EU: Was das BRUBEG für internationale Institute verändert Third-country banks in the EU: How BRUBEG changes the regulatory landscape for international institutions | Alles Legal #140
Read More

Third-country banks in the EU: How BRUBEG changes the regulatory landscape for international institutions | Alles Legal #140

Germany's implementation of CRD VI through BRUBEG introduces a new regulatory framework for third-country banks operating in the EU. Renate Prinz explains when international institutions will need an EU subsidiary or branch, how reverse solicitation will be assessed in the future, and why banks should already be preparing for the rules taking effect in 2027.
Read More